Hi Yushan,
I would assume that this is not possible, because:
different influence of the chemical shift displacement error, but I canāt say if this is considered in the basis set and how high this influence is. For PRESS, this error would vary anyway.
different evolution of the j-coupling, because adiabatic pulses can prevent it.
besides the pulses you have to take the timings into account, in PRESS you have to look at TE1/TE2, in sLASER TE1/ā¦/TE4 (+MEGA pulse position)
maybe some points moreā¦
All in all, every point has influence on the evolution of the j coupling and in MEGA youāre looking at scalar coupled systems. But nevertheless, you can try. Maybe it works.
Thank you very much for your response and detailed explanation!
I am not familiar with the relationship between adiabatic pulses and evolution of the j-coupling. I would like to read some relevant materials. Do you have any recommendations?
Basis sets for PRESS and sLASER generally shouldnāt be interchangeable, and certainly even less so for MEGA-edited sequences, where the effects of chemical shift displacement on the refocusing are even more substantial.
Since itās 7T (where few people use PRESS), my guess is that this specific basis set is indeed for sLASER (i.e. in the correct folder, just with an incorrect filename). @Helge uploaded that basis set a few years ago, Iām tagging him to see if he can clarify.